4.7 Article

Functionally graded structures realized based on Fe-Mn-Al-Ni shape memory alloys

Journal

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.10.057

Keywords

FeMnAlNi; Iron-based shape memory alloy; Selective aging; Precipitates; Functionally graded shape memory alloy

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [400008732]
  2. University of Kassel (SmartCon project)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel approach was introduced to obtain functionally graded properties in an Fe-Mn-Al-Ni shape memory alloy by aging a single crystalline sample in a partially martensitic state. The properties in the austenite aged area showed changed superelastic hysteresis, while the martensite aged area remained almost unchanged. The mean average size of nanometric beta precipitates strongly influenced the transformation temperatures and stresses in different aged areas.
In the present study a novel approach to obtain functionally graded properties in an Fe-Mn-Al-Ni shape memory alloy is introduced. A single crystalline sample showing superelastic properties was aged in a partially martensitic state. As a result, the area aged in austenite is characterized by a changed superelastic hysteresis with different critical stresses for forward and backward transformation, whereas the properties in the area aged in martensite remained almost unchanged. Transmission electron microscopy studies revealed that the mean average size of nanometric beta precipitates, which strongly influence the transformation temperatures and eventually the transformation stresses, is about 9 nm in the area aged in martensite and about 12 nm in the area aged in austenite. Based on these results it seems to be feasible to tailor Fe-Mn-Al-Ni components in a way allowing them to show locally different functional properties. (C) 2020 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available