4.7 Article

Grain growth competition during sintering of SrTiO3 nanocrystals: Ordered coalescence of nanocrystals versus conventional mechanism

Journal

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.113703

Keywords

Abnormal grain growth; Coalescence; Strontium titanate; Growth kinetics; Sintering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Grain growth during heating treatment is crucial for the development of microstructures in polycrystalline materials. SrTiO3 ceramics sintered at different heating rates exhibit distinct grain growth behaviors and microstructures, with two different mechanisms of grain growth dominating at different heating rates. The switch of growth mechanisms is determined by the competition between the activation of grain motions and the formation of steady neck among grains.
Grain growth plays a crucial role in developing the microstructures of polycrystalline materials during heating treatment. In this work, SrTiO3 ceramics sintered at different heating rates (10 degrees C/min and 100 degrees C/min) display the distinctly different grain growth behaviors and microstructures between them. The onset temperature of rapid grain growth and mechanical-performance-related fracture mode are apparently different between these two sets of samples. Two grain growth mechanisms are demonstrated to dominate separately the sintering of SrTiO3 nanocrystals at different heating rates, i.e. conventional mechanism of atom-by-atom additions for grain growth at 10 degrees C/min and ordered coalescence of nanocrystals for grain growth at 100 degrees C/min. It is demonstrated that the switch of growth mechanisms is determined by the competition between the activation of grain motions and the formation of steady neck among grains. (c) 2020 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available