4.1 Article

Probabilistic model checking for human activity recognition in medical serious games

Journal

SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scico.2021.102629

Keywords

Activity description; Probabilistic model; Model checking; Serious games; Bio-medicine

Funding

  1. French Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur region [13678]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a formal approach to model human activity recognition, translating activity descriptions into formal models with DTMCs and using PRISM framework to check temporal logic properties. The approach is illustrated with models of serious games used to monitor Alzheimer patients, aiming to provide new indications for interpreting patient performances.
Human activity recognition plays an important role especially in medical applications. This paper proposes a formal approach to model such activities, taking into account possible variations in human behavior. Starting from an activity description enriched with event occurrence probabilities, we translate it into a corresponding formal model based on discrete-time Markov chains (DTMCs). We use the PRISM framework and its model checking facilities to express and check interesting temporal logic properties concerning the dynamic evolution of activities. We illustrate our approach with the models of several serious games used by clinicians to monitor Alzheimer patients. We expect that such a modeling approach could provide new indications for interpreting patient performances. This paper addresses the definition of patient's models for three serious games and the suitability of this approach to check behavioral properties of medical interest. Indeed, this is a mandatory first step before clinical studies with patients playing these games. Our goal is to provide a new tool for doctors to evaluate patients. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available