4.5 Article

Actionable Principles for Artificial Intelligence Policy: Three Pathways

Journal

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-020-00277-3

Keywords

Artificial intelligence policy; Actionable principles; Ethics; Ethics of artificial intelligence; Governance of artificial intelligence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel framework for the development of 'Actionable Principles for AI', drawing on elements from the development process of the European Commission's High Level Expert Group on AI's Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. The paper suggests three propositions for the formation of a prototype framework, including preliminary landscape assessments, multi-stakeholder participation and cross-sectoral feedback, and mechanisms to support implementation and operationalizability.
In the development of governmental policy for artificial intelligence (AI) that is informed by ethics, one avenue currently pursued is that of drawing on AI Ethics Principles. However, these AI Ethics Principles often fail to be actioned in governmental policy. This paper proposes a novel framework for the development of 'Actionable Principles for AI'. The approach acknowledges the relevance of AI Ethics Principles and homes in on methodological elements to increase their practical implementability in policy processes. As a case study, elements are extracted from the development process of the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI of the European Commission's High Level Expert Group on AI. Subsequently, these elements are expanded on and evaluated in light of their ability to contribute to a prototype framework for the development of 'Actionable Principles for AI'. The paper proposes the following three propositions for the formation of such a prototype framework: (1) preliminary landscape assessments; (2) multi-stakeholder participation and cross-sectoral feedback; and, (3) mechanisms to support implementation and operationalizability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available