4.8 Article

Combined liver-cytokine humanization comes to the rescue of circulating human red blood cells

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 371, Issue 6533, Pages 1019-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abe2485

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Animal Modeling Core of the YCCEH, a YCCEH Pilot grant [NIDDK U54DK106857]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  3. NIH/NIDDK [R01DK102792]
  4. Frederick A. Deluca Foundation
  5. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  6. National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China [81800122, 81801588]
  7. NIH/NIAID [K99AI125065]
  8. James Hudson Brown-Alexander Brown Coxe Postdoctoral Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This immunodeficient murine model with combined human liver and cytokine humanization enhances human erythropoiesis and RBC survival in circulation. It can be used to study diseases affecting RBCs and replicate acute sickle cell disease pathology.
In vivo models that recapitulate human erythropoiesis with persistence of circulating red blood cells (RBCs) have remained elusive. We report an immunodeficient murine model in which combined human liver and cytokine humanization confer enhanced human erythropoiesis and RBC survival in the circulation. We deleted the fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (Fah) gene in MISTRG mice expressing several human cytokines in place of their murine counterparts. Liver humanization by intrasplenic injection of human hepatocytes (huHep) eliminated murine complement C3 and reduced murine Kupffer cell density. Engraftment of human sickle cell disease (SCD)-derived hematopoietic stem cells in huHepMISTRGFah(-/-) mice resulted in vaso-occlusion that replicated acute SCD pathology. Combined liver-cytokine-humanized mice will facilitate the study of diseases afflicting RBCs, including bone marrow failure, hemoglobinopathies, and malaria, and also preclinical testing of therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available