4.3 Article

Governance challenges for commercial exploitation of a non-timber forest product by marginalized rural communities

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 208-220

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0376892916000072

Keywords

Atlantic Forest; community-based conservation; Euterpe edulis; forest governance; social capital; sustainable development

Funding

  1. Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies, Yale University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While conservation and development projects focusing on non-timber forest products (NTFPs) remainpopular approaches to address complex issues of livelihood improvement and conservation, governance of NTFPs is still poorly understood. In the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot of Brazil, non-governmental organizations, researchers and community leaders are encouraging the commercialization of fruit pulp-based products from the endangered palm Euterpe edulis, known as jucara, to replace income from illegal heart of palm extraction. In order to assess the governance of development of jucara pulp as an NTFP and the potential to increase conservation of ju, cara through management on smallholder properties, we conducted qualitative research in Sao Paulo State from October 2012 to October 2013. Major challenges include policy barriers, difficulties integrating production and commercialization, problematic assumptions about poverty alleviation and the inability of the most disadvantaged members of communities to benefit. These governance challenges are a function of poor access, or the 'bundle of powers' that enables the ability to benefit. However, engagement with jucara fruit pulp production links farmers and former poachers with sustainable agricultural concepts and with networks, changing their perceptions of conservation and enhancing ability to benefit from improved policy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available