4.5 Article

Room temperature laser power standard using a microfabricated, electrical substitution bolometer

Journal

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
Volume 92, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0032366

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AFMETCAL calibration coordination group (CCG) [CCG-674]
  2. NIST
  3. Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation, Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A room temperature electrical substitution radiometer is described for measuring laser power as an absolute standard, achieving high accuracy over a wide range of wavelengths, beam diameters, and powers. The instrument uses a silicon microfabricated bolometer with carbon nanotube absorbers and commercial surface mount thermistors. Validation was done against NIST and AFMETCAL standards.
The design and performance of a room temperature electrical substitution radiometer for use as an absolute standard for measuring continuous-wave laser power over a wide range of wavelengths, beam diameters, and powers are described. The standard achieves an accuracy of 0.46% (k = 2) for powers from 10 mW to 100 mW and 0.83% (k = 2) for powers from 1 mW to 10 mW and can accommodate laser beam diameters (1/e(2)) up to 11 mm and wavelengths from 300 nm to 2 mu m. At low power levels, the uncertainty is dominated by sensitivity to fluctuations in the thermal environment. The core of the instrument is a planar, silicon microfabricated bolometer with vertically aligned carbon nanotube absorbers, commercial surface mount thermistors, and an integrated heater. Where possible, commercial electronics and components were used. The performance was validated by comparing it to a National Institute of Standards and Technology primary standard through a transfer standard silicon trap detector and by comparing it to the legacy C-series standards in operation at the U.S. Air Force Metrology and Calibration Division (AFMETCAL).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available