4.2 Article

Analysis of inspiratory and expiratory muscles using ultrasound in rats: A reproducible and non-invasive tool to study respiratory function

Journal

RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 285, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2020.103596

Keywords

Ultrasound; Rat; Diaphragm; Rectus abdominis

Funding

  1. Chancellerie des Universites de Paris (Legs Poix)
  2. Fondation de France
  3. INSERM
  4. Universite de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
  5. Fondation Medisite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrasound imaging is an accurate and reproducible technique for assessing and monitoring diaphragm and rectus abdominis structure and function in rats. Measuring respiratory parameters provides normal eupneic values. Histological studies and plethysmography were used to validate the technique and assess the physiological implications.
Ultrasound imaging is a non-invasive technique to assess organ function. Its potential application in rodents to evaluate respiratory function remains poorly investigated. We aimed to assess and validate ultrasound technique in rats to analyze inspiratory and expiratory muscles. We measured respiratory parameters to provide normal eupneic values. Histological studies and plethysmography were used to validate the technique and assess the physiological implications. A linear relationship was observed between ultrasound and histological data for diaphragm and rectus abdominis (RA) measurement. The tidal volume was significantly correlated with the right + left RA area (r = 0.76, p < 0.001), and the rapid shallow breathing index was significantly and inversely correlated with the right + left RA area (r=-0.53, p < 0.05). In the supine position, the right and left diaphragm expiratory thickness were not associated with tidal volume obtained in the physiological position. Ultrasound imaging is highly accurate and reproducible to assess and follow up diaphragm and RA structure and function in rats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available