4.7 Article

Quantifying structural uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of wind turbine wakes

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages 1550-1558

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.148

Keywords

Wind turbine wakes; CFD RANS; Turbulence modeling; Uncertainty quantification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantifies the structural uncertainties of RANS models in simulating wake flow behind a stand-alone wind turbine by introducing perturbations to the Reynolds stress tensor. The k-ω SST model tends to predict higher levels of isotropy in the turbulent wake, and adjustments in perturbation amount are needed to improve agreement with LES data.
Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) based modeling is considered the mainstream computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach for wind energy applications. Considering the inherent shortcomings associated with RANS models, quantification of uncertainties is of obvious importance if these models are to be used for design and optimization of wind farms. In the present work, structural uncertainties of RANS closure are quantified for simulations of wake flow behind a stand-alone wind turbine. The uncertainty is modeled by introducing perturbations to the Reynolds stress tensor. We specifically focus on perturbations in the eigenvalues of the tensor. The k-omega SST model and large-eddy simulation (LES) data are used as the baseline RANS model and reference data, respectively. Initially we compare the unperturbed RANS simulation against LES data, and show that the k-omega SST model generally tends to predict higher levels of isotropy in the turbulent wake. A comparison between LES data and differently perturbed k-omega SST simulations is made for the evolution of velocity deficit and turbulence intensity behind the turbine. A satisfactory coverage of LES profiles is observed when the amount of introduced perturbation is adjusted based on a priori comparison of the baseline RANS and LES results with the exception of the turbulent intensity immediately behind the turbine. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available