4.7 Article

Renewable energy consumption, financial development, environmental pollution, and innovations in the ASEAN thorn+3 group: Evidence from (P-ARDL) model

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages 689-700

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.052

Keywords

Financial development; Economic freedom; Innovation; Environmental pollution; Renewable energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that financial expansion has limited impact on renewable energy consumption, while environmental pollution and economic freedom are negatively correlated with renewable energy consumption. However, innovation and real GDP are positively correlated with renewable energy consumption.
To maintain economic and environmental sustainability, the study examines the influence of five major factors affecting renewable energy consumption. These five major factors include financial development, environmental pollution, innovation, economic freedom, and real GDP per capita in the ASEAN +3 economies during 1998-2018. By testing five hypotheses via the panel ARDL analysis and the Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality test, several interesting results were revealed. The results confirmed that financial expansion does not play a major role in the impacts on renewable energy consumption. Also, environmental pollution and economic freedom have a negative correlation with renewable energy consumption. However, the relationship between innovation and real GDP with renewable energy is positive. The results suggest that the ASEAN+3 group should reinforce strategies that support renewable energy projects to achieve economic and environmental sustainability. The study provides some recommendations for ASEAN +3 economies that can help them promote strategies that support renewable energy projects that maintain the economic and environmental sustainability. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available