4.8 Article

A generalized dynamical model for wind speed forecasting

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110421

Keywords

Nonstationarity; Dynamic model; Scenario prediction; Wind speed; Wind power; Bayesian forecasting

Funding

  1. Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES) [001]
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [307403/2019-0]
  3. Carlos Chagas Filho Research Support Foundation of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [202.673/2018, 211.086/2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study models wind speed using dynamic Weibull and Gamma state space models and derives filtering, smoothing, and prediction equations. Efficient simulation is achieved through the beta prime distribution for fast online wind speed forecasting. Results suggest that the dynamic Gamma model competes well with the Weibull model in wind speed prediction.
The Weibull distribution is commonly used to model wind speed data, mainly due to its good fit to asymmetric positive variables. Several proposals have extended this approach to accommodate realistic features of wind data such as nonstationary behavior due to changes in atmospheric regimes. The present work considers wind speed modeling over time through the dynamic Weibull and Gamma state space models. Properties of both models are presented and filtering, smoothing and prediction equations are analytically obtained. Efficient simulation of scenarios is obtained through the beta prime distribution, which allows fast online forecasts of wind speed. The models are compared regarding fit and predictive performance for the analysis of two wind speed datasets in different regions of Brazil. Results indicate that the dynamic Gamma model is competitive with the Weibull model for wind prediction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available