4.7 Article

Analysis of two-dimensional warranty data considering global and local dependence of heterogeneous marginals

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107327

Keywords

Heterogeneity; Two-dimensional data analysis; Copula; Global dependence; Local dependence

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675025]
  2. National Key RD of China [2016YFB0100400]
  3. Academic Excellence Foundation of BUAA for PhD Students

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper conducts a two-dimensional warranty analysis on data with heterogeneity in terms of both age and usage. Two models are developed to evaluate the severity of warranty claims, with different dependence structures. It is found that over 85% of claims are classified as normal failures, and local dependence structures may vary.
This paper conducts a two-dimensional warranty analysis on the data with heterogeneity in terms of both age and usage. Two models are developed to evaluate the severity of warranty claims. The first one uses a copula to describe the global dependence between the age and usage populations, whereas the second one further captures various local dependence in different warranty regions. Since the mixing proportions regarding heterogeneity are latent, the expectation maximization algorithm is proposed to estimate parameters and classify the warranty data. The likelihood ratio test is further utilized to determine the number of subpopulations. A comparison with two other models shows the superiority of the proposed one in terms of the Akaike information criterion. It is found that more than 85% of the claims are classified into normal failures, and local dependence structures might vary from a symmetric one to an asymmetric one. Meanwhile, as the sample size decreases, the heterogeneity of usage would vanish, and some local dependence structures would change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available