4.7 Article

Single-fraction prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: Dose reconstruction with electromagnetic intrafraction motion tracking

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 145-152

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.12.013

Keywords

Prostate cancer; Stereotactic body radiotherapy; Dose reconstruction; Electromagnetic transponder; Intrafraction motion; Single-fraction

Funding

  1. Fondation pour les recherches medicales et biologiques sur le cancer (Carouge GE, Switzerland)
  2. Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate motion was minimal for target coverage during single-fraction prostate SBRT with real-time electromagnetic tracking combined with beam gating.
Purpose: To reconstruct the dose delivered during single-fraction urethra-sparing prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) accounting for intrafraction motion monitored by intraprostatic electromagnetic transponders (EMT). Methods: We analyzed data of 15 patients included in the phase I/11 ONE SHOT trial and treated with a single fraction of 19 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV) and 17 Gy to the urethra planning risk volume. During delivery, prostate motion was tracked with implanted EMT. SBRT was interrupted when a 3-mm threshold was trespassed and corrected unless the offset was transient. Motion-encoded reconstructed (MER) plans were obtained by splitting the original plans into multiple sub-beams with isocenter shifts based on recorded EMT positions, mimicking prostate motion during treatment. We analyzed intrafraction motion and compared MER to planned doses. Results: The median EMT motion range (+/- SD) during delivery was 0.26 +/- 0.09, 0.22 +/- 0.14 and 0.18 +/- 0. 10 cm in the antero-posterior, supero-inferior, and left-right axes, respectively. Treatment interruptions were needed for 8 patients because of target motion beyond limits in the antero-posterior (n = 6) and/or supero-inferior directions (n = 4). Comparing MER vs. original plan there was a median relative dose difference of -1.9% (range, -7.9 to -1.0%) and of +0.5% (-0.3-1.7%) for PTV D-98(%) and D-2(%), respectively. The clinical target volume remained sufficiently covered with a median D-98(%) difference of -0.3% (-1.6-0.5%). Bladder and rectum dosimetric parameters showed significant differences between original and MER plans, but mostly remained within acceptable limits. Conclusions: The dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate motion was minimal for target coverage for single-fraction prostate SBRT with real-time electromagnetic tracking combined with beam gating. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available