4.7 Article

Citrus rootstocks regulate the nutritional status and antioxidant system of trees under copper stress

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 42-52

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.05.007

Keywords

Cupric fungicides; Metal homeostasis; Nutritional status; Oxidative stress; Rootstock signalling; Sweet orange

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2012/13917-7, 2012/21020-7]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [12/13917-7] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Copper (Cu) deficiency and toxicity cause stresses in citrus orchards and limited information is available about which rootstocks and associated mechanisms would enhance plant resistance to such nutritional disorders. Therefore, this study evaluated the nutritional status and antioxidant system responses of citrus grafted onto selected rootstocks differing in horticultural performance [Swingle citrumelo (SW) or Rangpur lime (RL)], grown in nutrient solution with varying concentrations of Cu (0.015, 0.60 or 24.0 mu M). The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse using young sweet orange trees. Once taken up, Cu mostly accumulated in roots (75% of total plant Cu content). Trees grafted onto RL were more responsive to enzyme activities related to oxidative stress and to nitrogen metabolism in leaves when grown in the presence of either the lowest or the highest Cu concentrations used. Those grown in 24.0 mu M Cu displayed decreased overall nutrient uptake and accumulation, with the exception of iron, which was predominantly found in roots. Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase activity in leaves was dependent upon signalling regulated by rootstocks, being lower in SW than in RL. Therefore, the use of appropriate rootstock varieties contributes to alleviate the effects of Cu stress on the metabolism and nutritional status of citrus plants. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available