4.7 Article

Beyond just being foot soldiers - osmotin like protein (OLP) and chitinase (Chi11) genes act as sentinels to confront salt, drought, and fungal stress tolerance in tomato

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 53-65

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.08.007

Keywords

Abiotic stress; Biotic stress; Chitinase; Co-Immunoprecipitation; Osmotin like protein; Pathogenesis-related proteins; Phosphofructokinase2

Funding

  1. UGC, New Delhi [32-569/2006 (SR)]
  2. CSIR, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osmotin like protein (OLP) and chitinase (Chi11) belong to pathogenesis-related (PR) class of proteins and are induced during both biotic and abiotic stresses. Transgenic tomato was developed with OLP and Chi11 via in vitro and in planta transformation methods. Transgenes integration and transcript levels were confirmed by multiplex PCR, DNA blot, and multiplex reverse transcriptase PCR. Homozygous T-2 transgenics when evaluated for salt, drought, and fungal stresses showed enhanced tolerance compared to untransformed controls (UC). Transgenics showed enhanced endochitinase activity and root biomass under normal conditions. Transformants also displayed higher proline content, K+, relative water content, chlorophyll fluorescence, total biomass, vascular conductivity, and fruit yield than the UC under stress conditions. Co-immunoprecipitation revealed that Chi11 co-expresses with phosphofructokinase2 (PFK2), which may play a role in enhanced root biomass. qPCR analysis resulted in higher transcript levels of OLP, Chi11, and PFK2 in transgenics as compared to the untransformed controls. Our findings suggest the use of multiples genes to confer multiple stress tolerance for enhanced crop productivity. This work unveils a new molecular player PFK2, which may play a role in enhanced root biomass. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available