4.6 Review

A systematic review of event-related potentials as outcome measures of attention bias modification

Journal

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13801

Keywords

anxiety; cognitive bias; cognitive bias modification; ERP; P2

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health [R15MH110951]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ABM was initially developed to reduce attentional bias to threat in individuals with heightened anxiety and has been found generally effective. Using ERPs as outcome measures shows promise, with modulation seen particularly in P1, P2, N2, and ERN components. Future research directions include investigating the extent of ABM's impact on different stages of information processing.
Attention bias modification (ABM) was initially developed with the goal of reducing attentional bias to threat-and subsequently anxious symptoms-in individuals with heightened anxiety. Although controversial, ABM appears to be generally effective in achieving this goal. Yet, the primary outcome measure of ABM (i.e., the reaction time-based differences score) has poor reliability and temporal resolution, which limits the inferences that can be drawn. In contrast, event-related potentials (ERPs) have superior reliability as well as temporal resolution and may therefore be better outcome measures of ABM. In this review, I systematically assess the research using ERPs as outcome measures in ABM protocols. I focus on the extent to which the ERPs modified by ABM represent earlier or later stages of information processing. In addition, I explore the extent to which ABM produces near and/or far transfer of learning effects on ERP measures. The reviewed literature suggests that ERPs are promising outcome measures of ABM. ABM modulates the effects of affective stimuli on posterior visually evoked ERPs (i.e., P1) as well as ERPs at anterior electrodes (i.e., P2, N2, and ERN). Based on the state of the field, several directions for future research are identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available