4.7 Review

Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on working memory in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 296, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113656

Keywords

Transcranial electrical stimulation; Cognition; Schizophrenia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) shows significant efficacy on working memory in schizophrenia in follow-up assessment, but not immediately after the last tES session. There was no significant difference in tolerability and dropouts between the active stimulation group and the sham stimulation group. Further large-scale RCTs with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm these findings.
To investigate the immediate and lasting effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) on working memory (WM) in schizophrenia. We performed a literature search to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the ability of tES to ameliorate WM. Twelve studies were included: 215 patients in the active stimulation group and 214 in the sham stimulation group. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant efficacy of tES on WM in follow up, a summary of one or more assessments weeks after the last tES session (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.62; p = 0.02; n = 190, 4 studies; I-2 = 33%) compared to sham tES, while non-significant results were observed for WM assessed immediately after the last tES session (SMD 0.14, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.41; p = 0.30; n = 417, 11 studies; I-2 = 41%) in schizophrenia. There was no significant difference between the two groups in tolerability and dropouts. Evidence of low quality indicates that effects of tES on WM in schizophrenia may appear a few weeks after the last tES session, but not always be present when tested immediately after the last tES session. Further large-scale RCTs with a parallel-group design, sample size estimation and a longer follow-up period are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available