4.3 Article

Cost of mHealth Versus Clinic-Based Care for Serious Mental Illness: Same Effects, Half the Price Tag

Journal

PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages 448-451

Publisher

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000349

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [CER-1403-11403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that mobile health intervention (FOCUS) and clinic-based group intervention (WRAP) produced similar clinical outcomes for treating serious mental illness. Labor costs were the largest expenditure for both interventions.
Objective: This study compared the costs of implementing a smartphone-delivered mobile health (mHealth) intervention (called FOCUS) with the costs of implementing a clinic-based group intervention (Wellness Recovery Action Planning [WRAP]) for serious mental illness. Treatments were delivered in parallel in a randomized controlled trial and produced comparable clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cost data were collected by using mixed-methods, top-down expenditure analysis with microcosting procedures. Costs were organized by input categories, including personnel, supplies, equipment, overhead, and indirect costs. All estimates are reported in US$. Results: The average annual cost to providers was $78,212 for WRAP and $40,439 for FOCUS. In both groups, labor accounted for the largest cost, followed by indirect costs and overhead costs. When indirect costs were excluded, WRAP cost $520 per client per month, compared with $256 for FOCUS. Conclusions: mHealth produced the same patient outcomes as clinic-based group treatment at approximately half the cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available