4.7 Article

Power rating procedure of hybrid concentrator/flat-plate photovoltaic bifacial modules

Journal

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 614-629

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pip.3410

Keywords

bifacial silicon; hybrid CPV/flat-plate PV module; III-V concentrator; power rating

Funding

  1. Horizon 2020 [857775]
  2. Secretaria de Energia de Mexico
  3. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hybrid concentrator/flat-plate photovoltaic technology combines III-V multi-junction and flat-plate bifacial solar cells to convert direct, diffuse and rear irradiance into electricity. The power output of the modules is evaluated and rated at standard test and operating conditions, with the results showing high efficiency and output levels.
Hybrid concentrator/flat-plate photovoltaic (CPV/flat-plate PV) technology combines III-V multi-junction and flat-plate bifacial solar cells to convert direct, diffuse and rear irradiance into electricity. For the first time, this article presents a procedure to rate the power output of such modules at standard test and standard operating conditions. The reference conditions, data filtering criteria, and translation methods are taken, and in some parts adapted, from the CPV, flat-plate PV, and bifacial PV International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards. The power rating is based on outdoor measurements performed on two hybrid modules (A = 1088 cm(2)) equipped with III-V triple- or four-junction solar cells mounted on bifacial positively doped passivated emmiter rear contact (p-PERC) c-Si cells. The results show that the modules, named triple- and four-junction EyeCon, convert the reference AM1.5g spectrum with an efficiency of 32.6% and 34.2%, respectively. This exceeds by 1.4%(abs) and 3%(abs) the highest value reported so far for a terrestrial module that harvests global irradiance. Additionally, the modules generate 11.5 and 10.9 W/m(2) for every 100 W/m(2) of rear irradiance to surpass an output of 350 W/m(2). Finally, the influence of illumination mode, type of irradiance sensor, and filtering criteria were evaluated, and a simplified alternative with an acceptable power output underestimation of 0.5%(rel) is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available