4.7 Article

Differences in developmental potential predict the contrasting patterns of dental diversification in characiform and cypriniform fishes

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2205

Keywords

Astyanax mexicanus; ectodysplasin; evolvability

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [IOS-1121855, IOS-1755305]
  2. Scientific Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic (VEGA) [1/0415/17, 1/0450/21]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides evidence for the influence of external or internal factors on morphological diversification during adaptive radiation, focusing on dental diversity in characiform fishes. Results suggest that differences in evolvability between lineages may lead to contrasting patterns of diversification, with implications for the retention of ancestral developmental potential.
Morphological diversification during adaptive radiation may depend on factors external or internal to the lineage. We provide evidence for the latter in characiform fishes (tetras and piranhas), which exhibit extensive dental diversity. Phylogenetic character mapping supported regain of lost teeth as contributing to this diversity. To test for latent potential for dentition that would facilitate its evolutionary expansion, we overexpressed a tooth initiation signal, the tumour necrosis factor pathway ligand ectodysplasin, in a model characiform, the Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus). This manipulation resulted in extensive ectopic dentition, in contrast with its previously reported limited effect in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Tooth location in the order Cypriniformes, to which the zebrafish belongs, is much more restricted than in characiforms, a pattern that may be explained by differences in the retention of ancestral developmental potential. Our results suggest that differences in evolvability between lineages may lead to contrasting patterns of diversification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available