4.7 Article

The demography of extinction in eastern North American birds

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1945

Keywords

historical DNA; Anthropocene; extinction; machine learning; birds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Species are disappearing at an unprecedented rate during the Anthropocene. Extinct bird species showed lower genetic diversity and population sizes compared to extant species, but both extinct and non-extinct birds had similar demographic histories, suggesting that overall population declines during the Pleistocene did not drive their extinction in the Anthropocene.
Species are being lost at an unprecedented rate during the Anthropocene. Progress has been made in clarifying how species traits influence their propensity to go extinct, but the role historical demography plays in species loss or persistence is unclear. In eastern North America, five charismatic landbirds went extinct last century, and the causes of their extinctions have been heavily debated. Although these extinctions are most often attributed to post-colonial human activity, other factors such as declining ancestral populations prior to European colonization could have made these species particularly susceptible. We used population genomic data from these extinct birds and compared them with those from four codistributed extant species. We found extinct species harboured lower genetic diversity and effective population sizes than extant species, but both extinct and non-extinct birds had similar demographic histories of population expansion. These demographic patterns are consistent with population size changes associated with glacial-interglacial cycles. The lack of support for overall population declines during the Pleistocene corroborates the view that, although species that went extinct may have been vulnerable due to low diversity or small population size, their disappearance was driven by human activities in the Anthropocene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available