4.8 Article

The Srs2 helicase dampens DNA damage checkpoint by recycling RPA from chromatin

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2020185118

Keywords

RPA regulation; Srs2; checkpoint dampening; genotoxic stress; recombinational repair

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH [R01GM080670, R01GM131058, R01GM130746, R01GM133967]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The DNA damage checkpoint induces cellular changes to cope with genotoxic stress, but persistent checkpoint signaling can be harmful to growth. Research shows that the DNA helicase Srs2 removes a key checkpoint sensor complex, RPA, from chromatin to down-regulate checkpoint signaling, aiding cellular survival of genotoxic stress. This mechanism is separate from Srs2's roles in recombinational repair and plays a critical role in genotoxin resistance.
The DNA damage checkpoint induces many cellular changes to cope with genotoxic stress. However, persistent checkpoint signaling can be detrimental to growth partly due to blockage of cell cycle resumption. Checkpoint dampening is essential to counter such harmful effects, but its mechanisms remain to be understood. Here, we show that the DNA helicase Srs2 removes a key checkpoint sensor complex, RPA, from chromatin to down-regulate checkpoint signaling in budding yeast. The Srs2 and RPA antagonism is supported by their numerous suppressive genetic interactions. Importantly, moderate reduction of RPA binding to single-strand DNA (ssDNA) rescues hypercheckpoint signaling caused by the loss of Srs2 or its helicase activity. This rescue correlates with a reduction in the accumulated RPA and the associated checkpoint kinase on chromatin in srs2 mutants. Moreover, our data suggest that Srs2 regulation of RPA is separable from its roles in recombinational repair and critically contributes to genotoxin resistance. We conclude that dampening checkpoint by Srs2-mediated RPA recycling from chromatin aids cellular survival of genotoxic stress and has potential implications in other types of DNA transactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available