4.8 Article

Elevated cerebrospinal fluid cytokine levels in tuberculous meningitis predict survival in response to dexamethasone

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2024852118

Keywords

tuberculous meningitis; cytokines; inflammation; corticosteroids; Bayesian analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The TT homozygosity of the LTA4H gene is associated with higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid, and it correlates with the efficacy of dexamethasone in tuberculous meningitis patients. This association extends beyond TT patients to non-TT individuals, suggesting that other genetic variations may also influence the responsiveness to dexamethasone.
Adjunctive treatment with antiinflammatory corticosteroids like dexamethasone increases survival in tuberculosis meningitis. Dexamethasone responsiveness associates with a C/T variant in Leukotriene A4 Hydrolase (LTA4H), which regulates expression of the proinflammatory mediator leukotriene B-4 (LTB4). TT homozygotes, with increased expression of LTA4H, have the highest survivalwhen treated with dexamethasone and the lowest survival without. While the T allele is present in only a minority of the world's population, corticosteroids confer modest survival benefit worldwide. Using Bayesian methods, we examined how pretreatment levels of cerebrospinal fluid proinflammatory cytokines affect survival in dexamethasone-treated tuberculous meningitis. LTA4H TT homozygosity was associated with global cytokine increases, including tumor necrosis factor. Association between higher cytokine levels and survival extended to non-TT patients, suggesting that other genetic variants may also induce dexamethasone-responsive pathological inflammation. These findings warrant studies that tailor dexamethasone therapy to pretreatment cerebrospinal fluid cytokine concentrations, while searching for additional genetic loci shaping the inflammatory milieu.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available