4.7 Article

Monitoring HPV vaccine impact on cervical disease: Status and future directions for the era of cervical cancer elimination

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106363

Keywords

Human papillomavirus; Vaccine; Vaccination; Effectiveness; Monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Post-licensure monitoring of HPV vaccines is crucial for tracking progress towards cervical cancer elimination, especially in preventing cervical infections and precancers. As the effectiveness of the vaccines in preventing cervical cancer begins to emerge, their potential appearance in other countries in the near future is anticipated.
Post-licensure monitoring of the impact of HPV vaccines is critical to track the progress being made toward cervical cancer elimination and to identify areas where further progress can accelerate the achievement of this important public health goal. Over the past decade, a large body of evidence has revealed convincing benefits of HPV vaccination in preventing cervical infections and precancers at the individual-level (i.e., direct effectiveness) as well as in reducing the population-level burden of disease (i.e., overall effectiveness). At this time, effectiveness of the vaccines on preventing cervical cancer is just beginning to emerge given that there is a prolonged latency period for invasive disease. As we enter the era of cervical cancer elimination, these early and promising results may be expected in other countries in the near future. Thus, monitoring the direct and overall effectiveness for cervical cancer is an urgent research priority. In this article, we summarize what is known about the effectiveness of HPV vaccines on precancerous outcomes, and we highlight considerations for continuing these important public health activities going forward to monitor progress toward cervical cancer elimination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available