4.2 Article

Overdose Receiving Centers - An Idea Whose Time Has Come?

Journal

PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 3-5

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1864073

Keywords

EMS; overdose; addiction treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drug overdose deaths, mostly involving opioids, have been the main cause of accidental death in the United States. Effective treatments like medication and harm reduction strategies are supported, but integrating opioid use disorder systems of care within emergency medical service (EMS) systems is rare. Establishing early intervention and treatment systems for opioid use disorders in emergency departments leads to higher treatment engagement and reduced mortality. Designating specialty centers for overdose patients in EMS systems may have a public health benefit.
Drug overdose deaths have been the leading cause of accidental death in the United States with two thirds involving opioids. Strong evidence supports the efficacy of medications for addiction treatment such as buprenorphine and harm reduction strategies such as naloxone distribution. While emergency medical service (EMS) systems have defined specialty centers for the treatment of many significant life threatening disease (trauma, stroke, myocardial infarction) implementation of opioid use disorder systems of care that integrate EMS are uncommon. As fentanyl drives the third wave of the opioid epidemic, EMS systems are uniquely positioned to direct patients to hospitals that can provide the best care for patients with Opiate Use Disorder (OUD.) Emergency Departments which have established systems for early intervention and treatment for patients with opioid use disorders have shown higher engagement in treatment programs. This, in turn, leads to lower mortality. EMS systems which designate specialty centers for overdose patients may show a public health mortality benefit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available