4.7 Article

Kinetic theory models for granular mixtures with unequal granular temperature. Derivation of analytical constitutive equations

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 385, Issue -, Pages 580-597

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.02.063

Keywords

Kinetic theory of granular flow; Binary mixture; Fluidization; Model derivation; Analytical solution; Granular temperature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on the kinetic theory of granular mixtures, examining granular temperature, particle velocity distribution, and constitutive equations resulting from collisions. It is found that some existing approximate solutions are inaccurate, while others may provide good approximations. Additionally, a review of balance laws and constitutive relations from mono- and poly-disperse kinetic granular flow model frameworks is conducted.
We consider kinetic theory of granular mixtures in which each solid phase is described by its own granular temperature. The particle velocities are assumed to follow a Mawellian distribution with zero-order approximation of the Boltzmann equation. The literature proposes a number of approximate solutions to the constitutive equations resulting from particle collisions. Here, we derive and show that analytical solutions exist, and reveal that some of the proposed approximate solutions are inaccurate whereas others might give good approximations. We also review the balance laws and constitutive relations resulting from the mono-and poly-disperse kinetic granular flow model frameworks. Such a review has been done here because the model framework on kinetic theory of mono-disperse granular flow systems has sometimes been adopted in models for granular mixtures. The consequence of such a simplification is that the kinetic energy loss in a collision between two particles of different species is equally shared among them. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available