4.7 Article

Filtration of kaolinite and coal mixture suspension: Settling behavior and filter cake structure analysis

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 381, Issue -, Pages 122-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.12.050

Keywords

Filtration; Settling; Kaolinite; Coal; X-ray microanalyzer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2003125]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the filtration of kaolinite-coal mixture suspension through settling behavior observation and filter cake structure analysis. A high kaolinite content mixture showed increased settling rate and specific filter cake resistance, forming fewer and smaller pores in the filter cake structure. The high settling rate led to quick filter cake formation during filtration, which increased the specific filter cake resistance.
The filtration of kaolinite-coal mixture suspension was investigated by settling behavior observation and filter cake structure analysis. Three-dimensional X-ray microanalysis was used to analyze filter cake structure. The settling rate and specific filter cake resistance of kaolinite-coal mixture gradually increased with the increasing content of kaolinite in suspension. A high settling rate made filter cake form quickly during filtration, which prevented water to pass through, increasing the specific filter cake resistance. Filter cake structure analysis showed kaolinite trapped fine coal particles into the gap between kaolinite flocs during filtration. The size and number of pores in the filter cake formed by a high kaolinite content mixture were smaller and fewer than that formed by a low kaolinite content mixture. A high specific cake resistance was created by a high kaolinite content mixture. This study provides a novel insight into the filtration of coal slurry in coal mining and cleaning processes. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available