4.5 Article

Additives to prevent the formation of surface defects during poly(vinyl chloride) calendering

Journal

POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages 1209-1219

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pen.25667

Keywords

additives; calendering; poly(vinyl chloride); rheology; surface defects

Funding

  1. Mitacs Accelerate [IT07985]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [CRDPJ 543853-2019, RGPIN 05948-2019]
  3. James McGill Chair program of McGill University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gas checks are visible defects on PVC films during industrial calendering, currently controlled by low film gauge and trial-and-error modifications. A series of PCL-based compounds with diester linkers and alkyl chain cappers were effective at preventing gas check defects, with higher melt viscosities playing an important role.
Gas checks are visible fleck-shaped defects that occur on the surface of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) films during industrial calendering. Films containing these surface defects often do not meet minimum product specifications and therefore must be disposed of or recycled, resulting in increased cost and material waste. Currently, gas checks are controlled by keeping film gauge low and through trial-and-error modifications of processing parameters by calender operators. In this work, our group developed a series of chemical additives that can be blended with PVC to prevent the formation of gas check defects. We found that a series of poly(caprolactone) (PCL)-based compounds with diester linkers and alkyl chain cappers were all effective at preventing the formation of gas checks during calendering, with additive concentrations as low as 8 phr producing films with no gas checks. We found that the blends produced with our additives had higher melt viscosities than those produced with additives that do not remove gas checks, suggesting that viscosity plays an important role in preventing gas check defects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available