4.7 Article

A comparison of predictive control strategies for a highly segmented injection mold tempering

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 218, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123494

Keywords

Tempering; Simulation; Warpage

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High precision, warpage free injection molded parts are highly in demand, and a mold with 18 individually controllable tempering zones has been developed to address the warpage issue. Experimental trials show that the model predictive control approach (MPC) is more precise than the PID control approach for superior control accuracy.
High precision, warpage free injection molded parts are highly in demand despite posing a great challenge. According to the pvT-behavior of the polymer, local variations of temperatures and pressures lead to inhomogeneous shrinkage which results in warpage. Since the pressure is dependent on the flow path, a homogenization of the specific volume is aimed by controlling the local mold temperatures. Therefore, a mold with 18 individually controllable tempering zones was developed, each zone equipped with ceramic heating elements and liquid CO2 expansion chambers. Due to the high mass of the mold, thermal processes underlie significant delays. The precise actuation of the tempering zones therefore requires a suitable control strategy. Two control strategies for the tempering zones were investigated on a basis of experimental trials. The tempering zones were initially controlled by a PID controller since it is easy to use and has low hardware requirements. To yield superior control precision, a model predictive control approach (MPC) has been recently developed and implemented, based on a discretized one-dimensional Fourier heat equation. The control accuracy of both control strategies was tested with an asymmetrical mold tempering experiment, which showed that the MPC is far more precise than the PID control approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available