4.6 Article

Development of a coronavirus disease 2019 nonhuman primate model using airborne exposure

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246366

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Military Infectious Diseases Research Program [150154769]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is found to be a prevalent route of human exposure. In a study comparing African green monkeys, rhesus macaques, and cynomolgus macaques exposed to the virus, respiratory abnormalities and viral shedding were observed in all animals. Fever was noted in cynomolgus macaques, while African green monkeys and rhesus macaques experienced thrombocytopenia. The findings suggest that macaques, in addition to African green monkeys, can serve as successful natural transmission models for evaluating medical countermeasures.
Airborne transmission is predicted to be a prevalent route of human exposure with SARS-CoV-2. Aside from African green monkeys, nonhuman primate models that replicate airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 have not been investigated. A comparative evaluation of COVID-19 in African green monkeys, rhesus macaques, and cynomolgus macaques following airborne exposure to SARS-CoV-2 was performed to determine critical disease parameters associated with disease progression, and establish correlations between primate and human COVID-19. Respiratory abnormalities and viral shedding were noted for all animals, indicating successful infection. Cynomolgus macaques developed fever, and thrombocytopenia was measured for African green monkeys and rhesus macaques. Type II pneumocyte hyperplasia and alveolar fibrosis were more frequently observed in lung tissue from cynomolgus macaques and African green monkeys. The data indicate that, in addition to African green monkeys, macaques can be successfully infected by airborne SARS-CoV-2, providing viable macaque natural transmission models for medical countermeasure evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available