4.6 Article

Impact of optical coherence tomography scan direction on the reliability of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247670

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ogonfonden, Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The repeatability of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in healthy eyes varied depending on scan direction and sectors, with vertical scans providing more homogeneous repeatability across sectors. Horizontal sectors showed better repeatability with 512 A-scans x 96 B-scans and 512 A-scans x 128 B-scans, while vertical sectors had better repeatability with 512 A-scans x 96 B-scans and 512 A-scans x 128 B-scans, showing more symmetric repeatability among sectors.
Purpose To evaluate the intradevice repeatability and agreement for peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) measurements in healthy eyes with two different scan directions and two different number of B scans. Methods pRNFL was measured with a spectral domain optical coherence tomography on 54 healthy participants. Three-dimensional optic disc scans (6 mm x 6 mm) were performed on the right eye of the participants. Two repeated scans were performed in four different settings: H1: Horizontal scan with 512 A-scans x 96 B-scans; H2: Horizontal scan with 512 A-scans x 128 B-scans; V1: Vertical scan with 512 A-scans x 96 B-scans; V2: Vertical scan with 512 A-scans x 128 B-scans. The pRNFL thickness was evaluated in twelve clock-hour sector in a circle of 3.45 mm diameter centred at the optic disc. Repeatability and agreement were assessed with within subject standard deviation (Sw) and Bland-Altman test respectively. Results The repeatability of pRNFL measurements varied depending on the scan direction and sectors. The repeatability for the horizontal sectors were better with H1 and H2, with sector 9 having the best Sw (< 3 mu m). The repeatability for the vertical sectors were better with V1 and V2 with sector 5 and 9 having the best Sw (< 4 mu m). The repeatability with vertical scan was more symmetric among the sectors than with horizontal scans. The repeatability metrics of the sectors did not vary much between H1 and H2 (difference < 2 mu m) and between V1 and V2 (difference < 3.2 mu m). Comparing horizontal and vertical scans, the vertical sectors had larger limits of agreement of about 45 mu m. Conclusion The reliability of the pRNFL thickness measurements is dependent on the direction of the scan and independent on the numbers of B-scans. Vertical scans for pRNFL gives more homogeneous repeatability across the different sectors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available