4.6 Review

A Systematic Review of Health Disparities Research in Plastic Surgery

Journal

PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
Volume 147, Issue 3, Pages 529E-537E

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007682

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. Axogen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review examines the current state of health disparities research in plastic surgery, finding a lack of research in gender-affirming, craniofacial, cosmetic, and hand surgery compared to breast reconstruction. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities were reported across subspecialties, with residence playing a significant role in access to care and surgical outcomes. The review suggests the need for more comprehensive research to address inequities at the patient, provider, and system levels in plastic surgery.
Background: In this systematic review, the authors report on the current state of health disparities research in plastic surgery and consider how equity-oriented interventions are taking shape at the patient, provider, and health care system levels. Methods: The authors performed a systematic literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases using search terms related to the social determinants of both health and plastic surgery. Two independent reviewers screened the article titles and abstracts for relevance and identified the plastic surgery focus and study characteristics of the included literature. The articles were then categorized as detecting, understanding, or reducing health disparities according to a conceptual framework. This review was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Results: One hundred forty-seven articles published between 1997 and 2019 met the inclusion criteria. Health disparities research in gender-affirming, craniofacial, cosmetic, and hand surgery was lacking relative to breast reconstruction. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities were reported across subspecialties. Place of residence was also a large determinant of access to care and quality of surgical outcomes. Half of the included studies were in the detecting phase of research. Meanwhile, 40 and 10 percent were in the understanding and reducing phases, respectively. Conclusions: Investigators suggested several avenues for reducing health disparities in plastic surgery, yet there is limited evidence on the actual effectiveness of equity-oriented initiatives. More comprehensive research is needed to disentangle the patient, provider, and system-level factors that underlie inequity across subspecialties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available