4.6 Article

Dim and bright void regimes in capacitively-coupled RF complex plasmas

Journal

PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6595/abe0a2

Keywords

dusty plasma; RF discharge; RF-period-resolved optical emission spectroscopy; void; 1D fluid model

Funding

  1. space agency of DLR
  2. federal ministry for economy and technology according to a resolution of the Deutscher Bundestag [50WP0203, 50WM1203]
  3. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD)
  4. Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The experiment demonstrates the existence of two qualitatively different void regimes in capacitively-coupled RF complex plasmas, namely the 'bright' void and the 'dim' void. The transition from the dim to the bright regime occurs discontinuously with an increase in discharge power.
We demonstrate experimentally that the void in capacitively-coupled RF complex plasmas can exist in two qualitatively different regimes. The 'bright' void is characterized by bright plasma emission associated with the void, whereas the 'dim' void possesses no detectable emission feature. The transition from the dim to the bright regime occurs with an increase of the discharge power and has a discontinuous character. The discontinuity is manifested by a kink in the void size power dependencies. We reproduce the bright void (mechanically stabilized due to the balance of ion drag and electrostatic forces) by a simplified time-averaged 1D fluid model. To reproduce the dim void, we artificially include the radial ion diffusion into the continuity equation for ions, which allows to mechanically stabilize the void boundary due to very weak electrostatic forces. The electric field at the void boundary occurs to be so small that it, in accordance with the experimental observation, causes no void-related emission feature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available