4.5 Article

Visual fixation in disorders of consciousness: Development of predictive models to support differential diagnosis

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 230, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113310

Keywords

Vegetative state; Minimally conscious state; Visual system; Visual behavior; Predictive modeling; Diagnosis

Funding

  1. Regione Lombardia (Italy) [project CRC, Coma Research Centre''] [IX/000407 -05/08/2010]
  2. Giovani Ricercatori fellowship from the Ministry of Health [GR-2016-02361225]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study used logistic regression models to analyze different neurophysiological data of patients with Disorders of Consciousness, highlighting the importance of structural MRI and visual evoked potentials data in predicting visual pursuit. A pilot test was conducted to validate the accuracy of the models, which may help clinicians evaluate whether the visual fixation response can support the MCS diagnosis.
The visual fixation represents a doubtful behavioral sign to discriminate Vegetative from Minimally Conscious State (MCS). To disentangle its meaning, we fitted univariate and multivariable logistic regression models matching different neurophysiological and neuroimaging data of 54 patients with Disorders of Consciousness to select the best model predicting which visual performance (visual blink or pursuit) was shown by patients and the best predictors set. The best models found highlighted the importance of the structural MRI and the visual evoked potentials data in predicting visual pursuit. Then, a qualitative pilot test was made on four patients showing visual fixation revealing that the obtained models correctly predict whether the patients' visual performance could support/correlate to a cognitively mediated behavior. The present pilot models could help clinicians to evaluate if the visual fixation response can support the MCS diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available