4.7 Article

Determining the temperature in heavy-ion collisions with multiplicity distribution

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 814, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136084

Keywords

Heavy-ion collisions; Temperature; Machine learning; Multiplicity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11890710, 11890714, 11625521]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the CAS [QYZDJ-SSW-SLH002]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the CAS [XDB34000000]
  4. Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research [2020B0301030008]
  5. Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Program of China [BX20200098]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By using the charge multiplicity distribution as a thermometer of heavy-ion collisions, researchers found characteristic signatures of nuclear liquid-gas phase transition around the apparent temperature, confirming the viability of determining the temperature in heavy-ion collisions with multiplicity distribution.
By relating the charge multiplicity distribution and the temperature of a de-exciting nucleus through a deep neural network, we propose that the charge multiplicity distribution can be used as a thermometer of heavy-ion collisions. Based on an isospin-dependent quantum molecular dynamics model, we study the caloric curve of reaction Pd-103 + Be-9 with the apparent temperature determined through the charge multiplicity distribution. The caloric curve shows a characteristic signature of nuclear liquid-gas phase transition around the apparent temperature T-ap = 6.4 MeV, which is consistent with that through a traditional heavy-ion collision thermometer, and indicates the viability of determining the temperature in heavy-ion collisions with multiplicity distribution. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available