4.7 Article

Testing primordial black holes as dark matter in supergravity from gravitational waves

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 814, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136069

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CUniverse research promotion project of Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, Thailand
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan [AP05133630]
  3. Talent Scientific Research Program of College of Physics, Sichuan University [1082204112427]
  4. Tokyo Metropolitan University
  5. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan
  6. Competitiveness Enhancement Program of Tomsk Polytechnic University in Russia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores a simple class of supergravity models that can explain and unify inflation and Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter. By computing the PBH-induced GW power spectrum, it is shown that GW signals can be detected within the sensitivity curves of future space-based GW interferometers.
We explore the Gravitational Waves (GW) phenomenology of a simple class of supergravity models that can explain and unify inflation and Primordial Black Holes (PBH) as Dark Matter (DM). Our (modified) supergravity models naturally lead to a two-field attractor-type double inflation, whose first stage is driven by Starobinsky scalaron and the second stage is driven by another scalar belonging to a supergravity multiplet. The PBHs formation in our supergravity models is efficient, compatible with all observational constraints, and predicts a stochastic GW background. We compute the PBH-induced GW power spectrum and show that GW signals can be detected within the sensitivity curves of the future space-based GW interferometers such as LISA, DECIGO, TAIJI and TianQin projects, thus showing predictive power of supergravity in GW physics and their compatibility. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available