4.7 Article

Studies of charm and beauty hadron long-range correlations in pp and pPb collisions at LHC energies

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 813, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.136036

Keywords

CMS; Ridge; Collectivity; Small systems; Heavy flavor; Elliptic flow

Funding

  1. FWF (Austria)
  2. FNRS (Belgium)
  3. FWO (Belgium)
  4. CNPq (Brazil)
  5. CAPES (Brazil)
  6. FAPERJ (Brazil)
  7. FAPERGS (Brazil)
  8. FAPESP (Brazil)
  9. MES (Bulgaria)
  10. MOST (China)
  11. NSFC (China)
  12. COLCIENCIAS (Colombia)
  13. CSF (Croatia)
  14. RIF (Cyprus)
  15. SENESCYT (Ecuador)
  16. MoER (Estonia)
  17. ERDF (Estonia)
  18. Academy of Finland (Finland)
  19. MEC (Finland)
  20. CEA (France)
  21. CNRS/IN2P3 (France)
  22. BMBF (Germany)
  23. DFG (Germany)
  24. HGF (Germany)
  25. GSRT (Greece)
  26. NKFIA (Hungary)
  27. DAE (India)
  28. DST (India)
  29. IPM (Iran)
  30. SFI (Ireland)
  31. INFN (Italy)
  32. NRF (Republic of Korea)
  33. MES (Latvia)
  34. MOE (Malaysia)
  35. UM (Malaysia)
  36. BUAP (Mexico)
  37. CONACYT (Mexico)
  38. UASLP-FAI (Mexico)
  39. FCT (Portugal)
  40. JINR (Dubna)
  41. MESTD (Serbia)
  42. SEIDI (Spain)
  43. FEDER (Spain)
  44. Swiss Funding Agencies (Switzerland)
  45. NSTDA (Thailand)
  46. TUBITAK (Turkey)
  47. TAEK (Turkey)
  48. NASU (Ukraine)
  49. DOE (USA)
  50. NSF (USA)
  51. Marie-Curie program
  52. European Research Council
  53. Horizon 2020 Grant (European Union) [675440, 752730, 765710]
  54. Leventis Foundation
  55. A.P. Sloan Foundation
  56. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  57. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office
  58. Fonds pour la Formation a la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture (FRIA-Belgium)
  59. Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie (IWT-Belgium)
  60. FWO (Belgium) under the Excellence of Science - EOS [30820817]
  61. Beijing Municipal Science AMP
  62. Technology Commission [Z191100007219010]
  63. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports(MEYS) of the Czech Republic
  64. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC 2121, 390833306]
  65. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  66. Council of Science and Industrial Research, India
  67. HOMING PLUS program of the Foundation for Polish Science
  68. European Union, Regional Development Fund
  69. National Priorities Research Program by Qatar National Research Fund
  70. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Russia) [02.a03.21.0005]
  71. Tomsk Polytechnic University Competitiveness Enhancement Program
  72. Programa Estatal de Fomento de la Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnica de Excelencia Maria de Maeztu [MDM-2015-0509]
  73. Programa Severo Ochoa del Principado de Asturias
  74. Thalis and Aristeia programs
  75. EU-ESF
  76. Greek NSRF
  77. Rachadapisek Sompot Fund for Postdoctoral Fellowship, Chulalongkorn University
  78. Kavli Foundation
  79. Nvidia Corporation
  80. SuperMicro Corporation
  81. Welch Foundation [C-1845]
  82. Weston Havens Foundation (USA)
  83. NKFIA (Hungary) [123842, 123959, 124845, 124850, 125105, 128713, 128786, 129058]
  84. National Science Center (Poland) [Harmonia 2014/14/M/ST2/00428, 2014/13/B/ST2/02543, 2014/15/B/ST2/03998, 2015/19/B/ST2/02861, Sonata-bis 2012/07/E/ST2/01406]
  85. BMBWF (Austria)
  86. CERN
  87. CAS (China)
  88. MSES (Croatia)
  89. ERC IUT (Estonia)
  90. PUT (Estonia)
  91. HIP (Finland)
  92. MSIP (Republic of Korea)
  93. LAS (Lithuania)
  94. CINVESTAV (Mexico)
  95. LNS (Mexico)
  96. SEP (Mexico)
  97. MOS (Montenegro)
  98. MBIE (New Zealand)
  99. PAEC (Pakistan)
  100. MSHE (Poland)
  101. NSC (Poland)
  102. MON (Russia)
  103. ROSATOM (Russia)
  104. RAS (Russia)
  105. RFBR (Russia)
  106. NRC KI (Russia)
  107. CPAN (Spain)
  108. PCTI (Spain)
  109. MoSTR(Sri Lanka)
  110. MST (Taipei)
  111. ThEPCenter (Thailand)
  112. IPST (Thailand)
  113. STAR (Thailand)
  114. STFC (United Kingdom)
  115. F.R.S.-FNRS
  116. Lendulet (Momentum) Program
  117. New National Excellence Program UNKP
  118. Mobility Plus program of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education
  119. Chulalongkorn Academic into Its 2nd Century Project Advancement Project (Thailand)
  120. STFC [ST/S000739/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurements of the second Fourier harmonic coefficient (v(2)) of prompt and nonprompt D-0 mesons in different collision conditions show comparable values in some cases, but suggest a mass dependence in v(2) between charm and beauty hadrons in the pPb system. These results provide insights into the origin of heavy-flavor quark collectivity in small systems.
Measurements of the second Fourier harmonic coefficient (v(2)) of the azimuthal distributions of prompt and nonprompt D-0 mesons produced in pp and pPb collisions are presented. Nonprompt D-0 mesons come from beauty hadron decays. The data samples are collected by the CMS experiment at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energies of 13 and 8.16 TeV, respectively. In high multiplicity pp collisions, v(2) signals for prompt charm hadrons are reported for the first time, and are found to be comparable to those for light-flavor hadron species over a transverse momentum (pT) range of 2-6 GeV. Compared at similar event multiplicities, the prompt D-0 meson v(2) values in pp and pPb collisions are similar in magnitude. The v(2) values for open beauty hadrons are extracted for the first time via nonprompt D-0 mesons in pPb collisions. For pT in the range of 2-5 GeV, the results suggest that v(2) for nonprompt D-0 mesons is smaller than that for prompt D-0 mesons. These new measurements indicate a positive charm hadron v(2) in pp collisions and suggest a mass dependence in v(2) between charm and beauty hadrons in the pPb system. These results provide insights into the origin of heavy-flavor quark collectivity in small systems. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available