4.6 Article

Test-Retest Reliability of the Mini-BESTest in People With Mild to Moderate Multiple Sclerosis

Journal

PHYSICAL THERAPY
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab045

Keywords

Balance Control; Multiple Sclerosis; Outcome Measurement; Test-Retest Reliability

Funding

  1. Doctoral School in Health Care Sciences
  2. NEURO Sweden
  3. Center for Innovative Medicine (CIMED) [SLL20190446]
  4. Karolinska Institutet-Region Stockholm
  5. Region Stockholm [SLL20180182]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the mini-BESTest demonstrated good to excellent test-retest reliability and small measurement errors in people with mild to moderate multiple sclerosis. Knowledge of limits of agreement and minimal detectable change greatly contributes to the interpretability of the test, enhancing its clinical usefulness for evaluating balance control and designing customized balance training for individuals with MS.
Objective. The mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a balance measure for assessment of the underlying physiological systems for balance control in adults. Evaluations of test-retest reliability of the mini-BESTest in larger samples of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate test-retest reliability of the mini-BESTest total and section sum scores and individual items in people with mild to moderate overall MS disability. Methods. This study used a test-retest design in a movement laboratory setting. Fifty-four people with mild to moderate overall MS disability according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were included, with 28 in the mild subgroup (EDSS 2.0-3.5) and 26 in the moderate subgroup (EDSS 4.0-5.5). Test-retest reliability of the mini-BESTest was evaluated by repeated measurements taken 1 week apart. Reliability and measurement error were analyzed. Results. Test-retest reliability for the total scores was considered good to excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients of .88 for the whole sample, .83 for the mild MS subgroup, and .80 for the moderate MS subgroup. Measurement errors were small, with standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of 1.3 and 3.5, respectively, in mild MS, and 1.7 and 4.7, respectively, in moderate MS. The limits of agreement were -3.4 and 4.6. Test-retest reliability for the section scores were fair to good or excellent; weighted kappa values ranged from .62 to .83. All items but 1 showed fair to good or excellent test-retest reliability, and percentage agreement ranged from 61% to 100%. Conclusion. The mini-BESTest demonstrated good to excellent test-retest reliability and small measurement errors and is recommended for use in people with mild to moderate MS. Impact. Knowledge of limits of agreement and minimal detectable change contribute to the interpretability of the mini-BESTest total score. The findings of this study enhance the clinical usefulness of the test for evaluation of balance control and for designing individually customized balance training with high precision and accuracy in people with MS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available