4.6 Review

Motor Control Exercises Compared to Strengthening Exercises for Upper- and Lower-Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal

PHYSICAL THERAPY
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab072

Keywords

Exercise Therapy; Motor Control and Motor Learning; Muscle Strength; Musculoskeletal Pain; Physical Therapists

Funding

  1. Dr Desmeules' Canadian Institutes of Health Research ProgramNew Investigator Salary and Research Award in Clinical Rehabilitation [201609NCR-375311-130299]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review compared the efficacy of motor control exercises (MCEs) to strengthening exercises for adults with upper- or lower-extremity musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs). It found that MCEs led to greater pain and disability reductions in the short term, but these effects might not be clinically important, except for specific conditions.
Objective. The purpose of this review was to compare the efficacy of motor control exercises (MCEs) to strengthening exercises for adults with upper- or lower-extremity musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs). Methods. Electronic searches were conducted up to April 2020 in Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL. Randomized controlled trials were identified on the efficacy of MCEs compared to strengthening exercises for adults with upper- or lower-extremity MSKDs. Data were extracted with a standardized form that documented the study characteristics and results. For pain and disability outcomes, pooled mean differences (MDs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using random-effects inverse variance models. Results. Twenty-one randomized controlled trials (n = 1244 participants) were included. Based on moderate-quality evidence, MCEs lead to greater pain (MD = -0.41 out of 10 points; 95% CI = -0.72 to -0.10; n = 626) and disability reductions (SMD = -0.28; 95% CI = -0.43 to -0.13; n = 713) when compared to strengthening exercises in the short term; these differences are not clinically important. When excluding trials on osteoarthritis (OA) participants and evaluating only the trials involving participants with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain, shoulder instability, hip-related groin pain, or patellofemoral pain syndrome, there is moderate quality evidence that MCEs lead to greater pain (MD=-0.74 out of 10 points; 95% CI=-1.22 to -0.26; n = 293) and disability reductions (SMD=-0.40; 95% CI=-0.61 to -0.19; n = 354) than strengthening exercises in the short term; these differences might be clinically important. Conclusions. MCEs lead to statistically greater pain and disability reductions when compared to strengthening exercises among adults with MSKDs in the short term, but these effects might be clinically important only in conditions that do not involve OA. Inclusion of new trials might modify these conclusions. Impact. These results suggest that MCEs could be prioritized over strengthening exercises for adults with the included non-OA MSKDs; however, results are unclear for OA disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available