4.8 Article

Constraints on Dark Matter Properties from Observations of Milky Way Satellite Galaxies

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 126, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.091101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  2. Fermilab [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [NSF AST-1517422, NSF PHY17-48958, NSF DGE-1656518, AST-1138766, AST-1536171]
  4. NASA through the NASA Hubble Fellowship - Space Telescope Science Institute [HST-HF2-51441.001]
  5. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  6. DOE (USA)
  7. NSF (USA)
  8. MEC/MICINN/MINECO (Spain)
  9. STFC (United Kingdom)
  10. HEFCE (United Kingdom)
  11. NCSA (UIUC)
  12. KICP (University of Chicago)
  13. CCAPP (Ohio State)
  14. MIFPA (Texas AM)
  15. CNPQ (Brazil)
  16. FAPERJ (Brazil)
  17. FINEP (Brazil)
  18. DFG (Germany)
  19. MICINN [ESP2017-89838, PGC2018-094773, PGC2018-102021, SEV-2016-0588, SEV-2016-0597, MDM-20150509]
  20. ERDF funds from the European Union
  21. CERCA program of the Generalitat de Catalunya
  22. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) ERC [240672, 291329, 306478]
  23. Brazilian Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia (INCT) e-Universe (CNPq) [465376/2014-2]
  24. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  25. Argonne Lab
  26. University of Cambridge
  27. CIEMAT-Madrid
  28. University of Chicago
  29. University College London
  30. DES-Brazil Consortium
  31. University of Edinburgh
  32. ETH Zurich
  33. Fermilab
  34. University of Illinois
  35. ICE (IEEC-CSIC)
  36. IFAE Barcelona
  37. Lawrence Berkeley Lab
  38. LMU Munchen
  39. University of Michigan
  40. NFS's NOIRLab
  41. University of Nottingham
  42. Ohio State University
  43. University of Pennsylvania
  44. University of Portsmouth
  45. SLAC
  46. Stanford University
  47. University of Sussex
  48. Texas AM University
  49. OzDES Membership Consortium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study on Milky Way satellite galaxies provides strong cosmological constraints on various particle models of dark matter, supporting the cold, collisionless dark matter paradigm. Limits are reported on the mass of thermal relic warm dark matter, velocity-independent dark matter-proton scattering cross section, and the mass of fuzzy dark matter, complementing other observational and laboratory constraints on dark matter properties.
We perform a comprehensive study of Milky Way (MW) satellite galaxies to constrain the fundamental properties of dark matter (DM). This analysis fully incorporates inhomogeneities in the spatial distribution and detectability of MW satellites and marginalizes over uncertainties in the mapping between galaxies and DM halos, the properties of the MW system, and the disruption of subhalos by the MW disk. Our results are consistent with the cold, collisionless DM paradigm and yield the strongest cosmological constraints to date on particle models of warm, interacting, and fuzzy dark matter. At 95% confidence, we report limits on (i) the mass of thermal relic warm DM, m(WDM) > 6.5 keV (free-streaming length, lambda(fs) less than or similar to 10 h(-1) kpc), (ii) the velocity-independent DM-proton scattering cross section, sigma(0) < 8.8 x 10(-29) cm(2) for a 100 MeV DM particle mass [DM-proton coupling, c(p) less than or similar to (0.3 GeV)(-2)], and (iii) the mass of fuzzy DM, m(phi) > 2.9 x 10(-21) eV (de Broglie wavelength, lambda(dB) less than or similar to 0.5 kpc). These constraints are complementary to other observational and laboratory constraints on DM properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available