4.8 Article

Remote Mesoscopic Signatures of Induced Magnetic Texture in Graphene

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 126, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.086802

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-FG0204ER46180]
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF-ECCS 1740136]
  3. nCORE [2760.001, 2760.002]
  4. Vetenskapsradet
  5. JSPS KAKENHI [18H01812]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H01812] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesoscopic conductance fluctuations are a common feature in small conductors, but this study reveals a breakdown of universality due to the interplay of local and remote phenomena in transport. The experiments demonstrate that remote factors can significantly impact conductivity in phase-coherent conductors, leading to giant conductance fluctuations exceeding theoretical predictions.
Mesoscopic conductance fluctuations are a ubiquitous signature of phase-coherent transport in small conductors, exhibiting universal character independent of system details. In this Letter, however, we demonstrate a pronounced breakdown of this universality, due to the interplay of local and remote phenomena in transport. Our experiments are performed in a graphene-based interaction-detection geometry, in which an artificial magnetic texture is induced in the graphene layer by covering a portion of it with a micromagnet. When probing conduction at some distance from this region, the strong influence of remote factors is manifested through the appearance of giant conductance fluctuations, with amplitude much larger than e(2)/h. This violation of one of the fundamental tenets of mesoscopic physics dramatically demonstrates how local considerations can be overwhelmed by remote signatures in phase-coherent conductors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available