4.6 Review

Why and how do termite kings and queens live so long?

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0740

Keywords

ageing; evolution; longevity; homeostasis; hypoxia; social insects

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18H05268]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H05268] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lifespan varies greatly across different organisms, with some extending longevity through trade-offs between reproduction and longevity, while social insect reproductives are exceptions, exhibiting both high reproductive outputs and long lives, attracting much attention for the reasons and mechanisms behind their extended lifespans.
Lifespan varies greatly across the tree of life. Of the various explanations for this phenomenon, those that involve trade-offs between reproduction and longevity have gained considerable support. There is an important exception: social insect reproductives (queens and in termites, also kings) exhibit both high reproductive outputs and extraordinarily long lives. As both the ultimate and proximate mechanisms underlying the absence of the fecundity/longevity trade-off could shed light on the unexpected dynamics and molecular mechanisms of extended longevity, reproductives of social insects have attracted much attention in the field of ageing research. Here, we highlight current ecological and physiological studies on ageing and discuss the various possible evolutionary and molecular explanations of the extended lifespans of termite reproductives. We integrate these findings into a coherent framework revealing the evolution of longevity in these reproductives. Studies on termites may explain why and how ageing is shaped by natural selection. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ageing and sociality: why, when and how does sociality change ageing patterns?'

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available