4.6 Article

Some people just want to watch the world burn: the prevalence, psychology and politics of the 'Need for Chaos'

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0147

Keywords

politics; Need for Chaos; marginalization; personality

Categories

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L011867/1]
  2. University of Melbourne, Australia
  3. ESRC [ES/L011867/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

People form political attitudes to fulfill psychological needs, and some individuals have a strong desire to incite chaos when they feel marginalized, possibly to invert power structures or gain social status. Research shows that chaos-seekers are not a unified political group, but a divergent set of malcontents.
People form political attitudes to serve psychological needs. Recent research shows that some individuals have a strong desire to incite chaos when they perceive themselves to be marginalized by society. These individuals tend to see chaos as a way to invert the power structure and gain social status in the process. Analysing data drawn from large-scale representative surveys conducted in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States, we identify the prevalence of Need for Chaos across Anglo-Saxon societies. Using Latent Profile Analysis, we explore whether different subtypes underlie the uni-dimensional construct and find evidence that some people may be motivated to seek out chaos because they want to rebuild society, while others enjoy destruction for its own sake. We demonstrate that chaos-seekers are not a unified political group but a divergent set of malcontents. Multiple pathways can lead individuals to 'want to watch the world burn'. This article is part of the theme issue 'The political brain: neurocognitive and computational mechanisms'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available