4.5 Review

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Effectiveness of Corticosteroids in Treating Adults With Acute Vestibular Neuritis

Journal

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
Volume 165, Issue 2, Pages 255-266

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1177/0194599820982910

Keywords

vestibular neuritis; corticosteroid; unilateral vestibulopathy; vertigo; recovery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of corticosteroids in treating acute vestibular neuritis in adults. Eight studies were reviewed, with six included in the meta-analysis. The results showed no significant differences in complete recovery rates between corticosteroid and placebo groups at 1, 6, and 12 months. While there was better caloric recovery in the corticosteroid group at 1 month, overall effects did not differ across 12 months. Subjective recovery also did not vary between groups. Five studies reported adverse effects from corticosteroids, leading to the conclusion that there is insufficient evidence to support their use in managing acute vestibular neuritis.
Objectives To determine whether steroids are effective in treating adults with acute vestibular neuritis. Data Sources PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, CAB Abstract, ICTRP, LILACS, PEDRO, ClinicalTrials.Gov, Google Scholar, NARIC, and OT Seeker. Review Methods A systematic review was undertaken for articles reporting subjective and/or objective outcomes of corticosteroids in adults with acute vestibular neuritis between December 2010 and October 2019. Reports of patient recovery from clinical vestibular outcomes at various time points and adverse effects from corticosteroids were of interest. Statistical analysis included qualitative and quantitative assessments. A limited meta-analysis of the data was performed through a random effects model. Results Eight studies met the criteria, and 6 were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences between the groups (corticosteroid vs placebo, corticosteroid vs vestibular exercise, or corticosteroid vs combination of vestibular exercise and corticosteroid) were reported in the proportion of patients with complete recovery at 1, 6, and 12 months. The corticosteroid group had significantly better caloric recover at 1 month (95% CI, -16.33 to -0.32); however, there was no significant difference to the overall effect between the groups across 12 months. Subjective recovery did not differ between the groups. Five of the 8 studies reported on adverse effects from corticosteroids. Conclusion There is insufficient evidence to support the use of corticosteroids in managing acute vestibular neuritis in adults. At present, corticosteroids appear to have short-term benefits in canal paresis but no long-term benefits in canal paresis and symptomatic recovery. Future studies should consider including a wider variety of clinical vestibular tests and frequent acute follow-ups to monitor the effects of corticosteroids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available