4.7 Article

The continuous strength method for the design of aluminium alloy structural elements

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages 338-348

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.040

Keywords

Aluminium alloys; Base curve; Columns; Continuous beams; Continuous strength method (CSM); Reliability analyses; Simply supported beams; Strain hardening; Structural design

Funding

  1. University of Hong Kong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aluminium alloys are nonlinear metallic materials with rounded stress-strain curves that are not well represented by the simplified elastic-perfectly plastic material model used in most existing design specifications. Departing from current practice, the continuous strength method (CSM) is a recently developed design approach for aluminium alloy structures, which gives consideration to strain hardening for non slender sections. The CSM is a deformation-based method and employs a base curve to define the continuous relationship between cross-section slenderness and deformation capacity. This paper explains the background and the two key components of the CSM: (1) the base curve, which is extended herein such that the method covers both non-slender and slender sections and (2) the strain hardening material model. Three international design specifications from America, Australia/New Zealand and Europe, as well as the CSM are compared with approximately 900 aluminium alloy experimental and numerical results. Reliability analyses have been carried out to assess the reliability level of different design methods according to both the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) and European Standard (EN 1990) approaches. Finally, worked examples of the CSM for aluminium alloy stub columns and continuous beams are illustrated in this paper. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available