4.6 Article

Poly(2,2′-(2,5-difluoro-1,4-phenylene)dithiophene-alt-naphthalene diimide) synthesized by direct (hetero)arylation reaction for all-polymer solar cells

Journal

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2020.106051

Keywords

Polymer acceptor; All-polymer solar cells; Direct (hetero)arylation reaction; poly(2,2 '-(2,5-difluoro-1,4-phenylene); dithiophene-alt-naphthalene diimide); Weak donor-strong acceptor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21704015, 51803144]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of Fujian [2018J01679]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20170337]
  4. 111 projects

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A weak donor-strong acceptor polymer acceptor PNB2F was designed and synthesized through a two-step direct (hetero)arylation reaction and applied in all-polymer solar cells, achieving a power conversion efficiency of 4.49%. The results suggest that direct (hetero)arylation reaction is a promising method for efficient and cost-effective synthesis of polymer acceptors.
The weak donor-strong acceptor polymer acceptors for all-polymer solar cells (all-PSCs) have gained much less attention compared with the typical donor-strong acceptor counterparts. Direct (hetero)arylation polymerization reaction is a rising synthetic method, although most of the naphthalene diimide polymer photovoltaic acceptors have been prepared by classic Stille polymerization. A weak donor-strong acceptor polymer acceptor PNB2F has been successfully designed and synthesized by the two-step direct (hetero)arylation reaction and further applied in all-PSCs. The all-PSC device based on PNB2F and electron-donating polymer PBDB-T gained a PCE of 4.49%. The results demonstrate that direct (hetero)arylation reaction is a promising tool for building efficient polymer acceptors with convenient and low-cost synthesis ideas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available