4.6 Article

Evaluation of head and neck soft tissue sarcoma 8th edition pathologic staging system and proposal of a novel stage grouping system*

Journal

ORAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105137

Keywords

Head and neck cancer; Sarcoma; Soft tissue sarcoma; TNM staging; AJCC; Oropharynx; Oral cavity; Larynx; Nasopharynx

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted multivariable analysis on HN-STS patients in the SEER database, showing that tumor invasion of adjacent structures and increasing de-differentiation were associated with poorer survival. The stage grouping system established using RPA was successfully validated in the NCDB cohort.
Background: The AJCC 8th edition issued a dedicated staging system for head and neck soft tissue sarcomas (HNSTS) with 2 and 4 cm tumor cut-off points, as well as a T4 classification based on invasion of adjacent structures. Stage groupings were not provided due to a paucity of data. Methods: We identified HN-STS patients undergoing primary surgery without neoadjuvant therapy patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We used multivariable analysis to examine adverse prognosticators. Then, using, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), we established a stage grouping system that was externally validated in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Results: Multivariable analysis in the SEER cohort (N = 546) demonstrated worsened survival with tumors invading adjacent structures (P < 0.001) and increasing de-differentiation (P < 0.001). There was no prognostic difference based on size for T1-3 tumors; however, when assessed as a continuous variable, a 5 cm tumor size cutoff point was predictive of outcome. RPA generated a stage grouping system with the following five-year overall survival: RPA Stage I (pT1-3N0-1G1-2M0) 71.2%, RPA Stage II (pT4abN0-1G1-2M0/pT1-3N0-1G3-4M0) 53.4%, and RPA Stage III (pT4abN0-1G3-4M0) 17.5%. This was successfully externally validated in the NCDB cohort (P < 0.001). Conclusions: We confirm the importance of structural invasion and grade and demonstrate that the currently used size cut-off points are not prognostic. We propose a novel stage grouping system. A 5 cm tumor size cut-off point for tumor stage should be further evaluated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available