4.6 Article

Impact of Refractive Outcomes on Bias in Follow-up and Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Laser Vision Correction

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 9, Pages 1284-1291

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.01.030

Keywords

patient reported outcomes; Lasik; PRK; Refractive Surgery; patient satisfaction

Categories

Funding

  1. University of California San Francisco Vision Core shared resource of the National Institutes of Health/National Eye Institute [P30 EY002162]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, New York

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to examine factors contributing to completion of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in patients undergoing laser vision correction. The results showed that patients with worse objective visual outcomes were more likely to complete PRO measures, indicating a need for methods to address loss to follow-up in PRO measures.
Purpose: To examine factors contributing to completion of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in patients undergoing laser vision correction. Design: Retrospective, population-based study. Participants: All patients who underwent primary laser vision correction with a target of plano from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016, at a large refractive surgery center. Methods: Patients were asked to complete a PRO measure at the time of their preoperative and months 1 and 3 postoperative visits. Characteristics between patients who attended and did not attend the follow-up visits and completed and did not complete the PRO measure were compared. A logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with likelihood of follow-up and completion of PRO measure. An inverse probability censoring weighted model was created to account for selective loss to follow-up and used to adjust the PRO satisfaction measure. Main Outcome Measure: Completion of the PRO measure at 1 and 3 months. Results: A total of 37 043 patients were identified. Of these, 20 501 completed a 1-month postoperative PRO measure and 10 474 completed a 3-month postoperative PRO measure. Patients completing a PRO measure were more likely to be older, be female, have had photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), have completed a preoperative PRO measure, and have had a preoperative hyperopic correction (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). For every line of postoperative uncorrected acuity worse than 20/16, the odds ratio of completing a PRO measure was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.36, P < 0.001) at 1 month and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.26-1.33, P < 0.001) at 3 months. At 1 month, there was no difference between the raw and model-adjusted rates of satisfaction with vision, but at 3 months the adjusted rate was significantly higher than the raw rate. Conclusions: Patients with worse objective visual outcomes were more likely to complete PRO measures in this population-based study. In a setting with loss to follow-up, PRO measures require methods to address missing data for correct interpretation. (C) 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available