4.5 Article

Asymmetric Multidepot Vehicle Routing Problems: Valid Inequalities and a Branch-and-Cut Algorithm

Journal

OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 380-409

Publisher

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/opre.2020.2033

Keywords

branch-and-cut; valid inequalities; asymmetric; multidepot; vehicle routing; upper-bound procedure

Funding

  1. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [438-13-216, 439-16-612]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [2014-05764]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A generic branch-and-cut framework is presented for solving routing problems with multiple depots and asymmetric cost structures, introducing new D-k inequalities and generalizing other known valid inequalities. The framework is effective in reducing optimality gaps and can handle larger instances than previously reported in the literature.
We present a generic branch-and-cut framework for solving routing problems with multiple depots and asymmetric cost structures, which determines a set of cost-minimizing (capacitated) vehicle tours that fulfill a set of customer demands. The backbone of the framework is a series of valid inequalities with corresponding separation algorithms that exploit the asymmetric cost structure in directed graphs. We derive three new classes of so-called D-k inequalities that eliminate subtours, enforce tours to be linked to a single depot, and impose bounds on the number of customers in a tour. In addition, other well-known valid inequalities for solving vehicle routing problems are generalized and adapted to be valid for routing problems with multiple depots and asymmetric cost structures. The framework is tested on four specific problem variants, for which we develop a new set of large-scale benchmark instances. The results show that the new inequalities can reduce root-node optimality gaps by up to 67.2% compared with existing approaches. Moreover, the complete framework is very effective and can solve instances of considerably larger size than reported in the literature. For instance, it solves asymmetric multidepot traveling-salesman-problem instances containing up to 400 customers and 50 depots, whereas to date only solutions of instances containing up to 300 customer nodes and 60 depots have been reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available