4.5 Article

Lianas do not reduce tree biomass accumulation in young successional tropical dry forests

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 195, Issue 4, Pages 1019-1029

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04877-z

Keywords

Biomass accretion; Biomass loss; Forest regeneration; Removal experiment; Tree size

Categories

Funding

  1. Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment
  2. Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion COLCIENCIAS
  3. Cullman Fellowship from the School of the Environment at Yale University
  4. New York Botanical Garden
  5. NSF [DEB 1019436]
  6. Marquette University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the common presence of lianas in tropical dry forests, removing them did not have a significant impact on overall biomass accumulation in the forest. The removal of lianas did not benefit smaller or larger trees, and had a negative effect on only a small number of tree species.
Young successional tropical forests are crucial in the global carbon cycle because they can quickly sequester large quantities of atmospheric carbon. However, lianas (woody vines) can significantly decrease biomass accumulation in young regenerating forests. Lianas are abundant in tropical dry forests, and thus we hypothesized that lianas reduce biomass accretion in dry forests. Lianas may be particularly detrimental to the growth of young trees, which are vulnerable to competition from lianas. Alternatively, lianas may have a stronger negative effect on the largest trees because lianas seek the high-light environment at the top of the forest canopy. We tested these hypotheses using a liana-removal experiment in 13 dry forest stands that ranged from 1 to 70 years in southwestern Panama. We measured biomass accumulation annually for more than 10,000 stems from 2013 to 2017. Contrary to our expectations, liana removal had no effect on tree biomass accumulation across our successional forests and throughout our study period. Liana removal did not benefit smaller trees or larger trees. Lianas did not increase biomass accumulation on recruits, and did not increase biomass loss due to mortality. Surprisingly, removing lianas had a negative effect on three out of 41 tree species. Lianas had no effect on biomass accumulation and loss, possibly because: (1) trees allocated resources to roots instead of stems, (2) trees and lianas partitioned water, (3) higher irradiance after liana removal reduced soil moisture, or (4) low water availability might have been such a strong stressor that it reduced plant-plant competition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available